Scientific Quotations
Of course, if one ignores contradictory observations, one can claim to
have an 'elegant' or 'robust' theory. But it isn't science ...
The crucial quality of science is to encourage, not discourage, the
testing of assumptions.
- Halton Arp, 1991,
from Science News, Jul 27.
A few years after the resignation of Sir Fred Hoyle, Halton
Arp was dining at high table in one of Britain's most noted
Colleges :
The don on my left enquired during dinner whether
I knew Fred Hoyle. When I said that I did and that I thought
highly of him, this professor looked around furtively,
lowered his voice to a whisper, and said, "He is a great
scientist who was treated very badly around here."
The statement did not surprise me, but I can never forget the
fearful whisper in which it was spoken, as if we were some kind
of occupied country.
- Halton Arp, 1987,
from 'Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies'
If many years go by in a field in which no significant new
facts come to light, the field sharpens up the opinions and gives the
appearance that the problem is solved ...
It is now virtually impossible to do any research outside the widely accepted
position. If a young man with no scientific standing were to attempt
this, however brilliant he might be, the wouldn't have a hope.
-
Thomas Gold, 1989, J. of Sci. Exploration, 3, No. 2, 103.
Shortly after the discovery of pulsars I wished to present an
interpretation of what pulsars were, at this first pulsar conference -
namely that they were rotating neutron stars. The chief organizer of
this conference said to me, "Tommy, if I allow for that crazy an
interpretation, there is no limit to what I would have to allow." I was
not allowed 5 minutes of floor time, although I in fact spoke from the
floor. A few months later, this same organizer started a paper with the
sentence, "It is now generally considered that pulsars are rotating
neutron stars."
-
Thomas Gold, 1989, J. of Sci. Exploration, 3, No. 2, 103.
Some of the topics covered by Thomas Gold in :
'New Ideas in Science'
- Carrying several 'parallel' equally viable interpretations of data.
- Carreerism (herd instinct) in the scientific community.
- Peer review conflict of interest.
- 'patching in' (shoehorn) discordant observations,
in order to build inverted pyramid (weak foundation)
What is distinctly missing from his paper is the fundamental
fact that belief is stronger than reason, this is at the
root of
closeminded science
with its many symptoms such as
the herd instinct, the inverted pyramid and
pathological skepticism.
Once one has accepted the fundamental precept that belief is stronger
than reason, it becomes a little easier to recognize this tendency
in oneself and in others, and possibly to minimize its nefarious
effects. The real 'truth seeker' is a rare animal and an endangered species
in the current environment of 'big science' and 'careerism'.
The following quote describes his true motivation:
Knowledge is an attitude, a passion, actually an illicit attitude. For the
compulsion to know is just like dipsomania, erotomania, homicidal mania,
in producing a character that is out of balance. It is not true that the
scientist goes after truth. It goes after him.
-Robert Musil, 1930, Der Mann ohne Eigenschafen, London: Picador.
Because belief is stronger than reason it is important to seek out the original
raw data, untarnished by interpretation.
Y.P. Varshni, 1990, Lecture, University of Ottawa
Looking through 'Medawar's keyhole'
With twentieth-century scientists, it is more often possible to compare
their published work with the raw material on which it was based.
The comparision is necessary because it often reveals serious discrepancies
between appearance and reality in the laboratory:
It is no use looking to scientific 'papers', for they do noy merely
conceal but actively misrepresent the reasoning that goes into the work
they describe ... Only unstudied evidence will do - and that means
listening at a keyhole
- Peter Medawar, biologist. (in Fraud and Deceit in Science, 1982).
Scientific Biographies and Quotations.